<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Insanity in DC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maurybrown.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=14" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14</link>
	<description>Sports Meets Balderdash (Random Thoughts On Maury Brown&#039;s Personal Blog)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 06:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&lt;font size=&quot;4&quot;&gt;WOW....&lt;/font&gt;

For those tuning in late tonight, after the emergency legislation for the cost cap failed, the council immediatly went back to work revising some the deal to get clarification on some sticking point that created the initial failure.

As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060208-122012-4592r.htm&quot;&gt;Tim Lemke of the Washington Times  reported early Weds. morning&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;[L]ate last night, the council began reconsidering the cap legislation, after receiving clarification on several provisions. It made it clear that the city would pay no more than $300 million for the &quot;hard cost&quot; of the stadium construction, plus $175 million in various &quot;soft costs,&quot; such as infrastructure and insurance. The rest of the money would be used for land acquisition and financing costs. All overruns for the project would have to be paid for by the team owner or other outside sources -- or through savings on construction of the stadium structure.
The cap legislation likely would require nine votes for approval, because it was an emergency measure. It was still not clear last night whether the council planned to vote again on the lease if they were satisfied by the changes to the cap legislation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well, Tim, they did vote. Here&#039;s how the revised vote went down (9-4) in favor:

YES:
Orange
Patterson
Barry
Schwartz
Brown
Cropp
Evans
Ambrose
Gray

NO
Catania
Fenty
Graham
Mendelson

A key swing vote was Marion Barry, who changed direction (imagine that) and has the quote of the entire day, &quot;That $71 million dollars can&#039;t be used for toilet paper for our young people&quot;

Here&#039;s what&#039;s key:

MLB has until March 6 to approve the cap or the lease agreement is dissolved.

That&#039;s going to be the key question: Will MLB agree to the change?

With this type of brinkmanship, one would think that MLB would find away to save face, cover their collective behinds and agree to this arrangement.

As I said... things can happen, and today and tonight, it certainly did.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Look for a new thread covering the late night vote passage after the inital failure, and MLB getting involved in the Marlins stadium efforts Weds. morning.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="4">WOW&#8230;.</font></p>
<p>For those tuning in late tonight, after the emergency legislation for the cost cap failed, the council immediatly went back to work revising some the deal to get clarification on some sticking point that created the initial failure.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060208-122012-4592r.htm">Tim Lemke of the Washington Times  reported early Weds. morning</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>[L]ate last night, the council began reconsidering the cap legislation, after receiving clarification on several provisions. It made it clear that the city would pay no more than $300 million for the &#8220;hard cost&#8221; of the stadium construction, plus $175 million in various &#8220;soft costs,&#8221; such as infrastructure and insurance. The rest of the money would be used for land acquisition and financing costs. All overruns for the project would have to be paid for by the team owner or other outside sources &#8212; or through savings on construction of the stadium structure.<br />
The cap legislation likely would require nine votes for approval, because it was an emergency measure. It was still not clear last night whether the council planned to vote again on the lease if they were satisfied by the changes to the cap legislation.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, Tim, they did vote. Here&#8217;s how the revised vote went down (9-4) in favor:</p>
<p>YES:<br />
Orange<br />
Patterson<br />
Barry<br />
Schwartz<br />
Brown<br />
Cropp<br />
Evans<br />
Ambrose<br />
Gray</p>
<p>NO<br />
Catania<br />
Fenty<br />
Graham<br />
Mendelson</p>
<p>A key swing vote was Marion Barry, who changed direction (imagine that) and has the quote of the entire day, &#8220;That $71 million dollars can&#8217;t be used for toilet paper for our young people&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s key:</p>
<p>MLB has until March 6 to approve the cap or the lease agreement is dissolved.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s going to be the key question: Will MLB agree to the change?</p>
<p>With this type of brinkmanship, one would think that MLB would find away to save face, cover their collective behinds and agree to this arrangement.</p>
<p>As I said&#8230; things can happen, and today and tonight, it certainly did.</p>
<p><em><strong>Look for a new thread covering the late night vote passage after the inital failure, and MLB getting involved in the Marlins stadium efforts Weds. morning.</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 04:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Yep... I&#039;m hearing that proponents on the council are trying to resurrect the deal. This isn&#039;t out of the question. I was personally involved in ballpark legislation that died on a Senate vote on a Friday, only to pass on a reconsider motion the next day after some amendments.

More to follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep&#8230; I&#8217;m hearing that proponents on the council are trying to resurrect the deal. This isn&#8217;t out of the question. I was personally involved in ballpark legislation that died on a Senate vote on a Friday, only to pass on a reconsider motion the next day after some amendments.</p>
<p>More to follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-21</guid>
		<description>More... it appears Cropp may call a speacial session. Waiting for more details on this.

In the meantime... DuPuy has commented...

&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.wtop.com/?nid=25&amp;sid=691403&quot;&gt;D.C. Council Rejects Stadium Lease Agreement&lt;/a&gt;
From WTOP News
Feb 7th - 12:44pm

WASHINGTON - The fate of baseball in the District is uncertain after the D.C. Council rejected a lease agreement for a new Washington Nationals stadium on Tuesday night.

The council voted 8 to 5 to reject the lease after a 2 ½ closed-door meeting in which members discussed emergency legislation that would cap the city&#039;s construction costs for the stadium at $300 million. That measure would need nine votes to pass.

But members could not agree on a measure, and opponents of the lease said they could not support the lease as it exists.

[snip]

Before the vote, Ward 2 Councilman Jack Evans, baseball&#039;s biggest supporter on the council, said he believed the Nationals would remain at RFK Stadium for the next year or two, then move somewhere else.

&quot;Today&#039;s vote is a serious setback to all those in the Washington community who sought the return of a team to the nation&#039;s capital,&quot; Bob DuPuy, baseball&#039;s chief operating officer, said in a statement. &quot;I regret very much that D.C. officials have failed to honor the agreement they made when they successfully bid for the Expos to move to Washington. Baseball has no choice but to pursue arbitration so the terms of our original agreement can be honored and to begin to explore whatever options are available to us.&quot;
&lt;em&gt;(to read the entire article, use the link provided above)&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More&#8230; it appears Cropp may call a speacial session. Waiting for more details on this.</p>
<p>In the meantime&#8230; DuPuy has commented&#8230;</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wtop.com/?nid=25&#038;sid=691403">D.C. Council Rejects Stadium Lease Agreement</a><br />
From WTOP News<br />
Feb 7th &#8211; 12:44pm</p>
<p>WASHINGTON &#8211; The fate of baseball in the District is uncertain after the D.C. Council rejected a lease agreement for a new Washington Nationals stadium on Tuesday night.</p>
<p>The council voted 8 to 5 to reject the lease after a 2 ½ closed-door meeting in which members discussed emergency legislation that would cap the city&#8217;s construction costs for the stadium at $300 million. That measure would need nine votes to pass.</p>
<p>But members could not agree on a measure, and opponents of the lease said they could not support the lease as it exists.</p>
<p>[snip]</p>
<p>Before the vote, Ward 2 Councilman Jack Evans, baseball&#8217;s biggest supporter on the council, said he believed the Nationals would remain at RFK Stadium for the next year or two, then move somewhere else.</p>
<p>&#8220;Today&#8217;s vote is a serious setback to all those in the Washington community who sought the return of a team to the nation&#8217;s capital,&#8221; Bob DuPuy, baseball&#8217;s chief operating officer, said in a statement. &#8220;I regret very much that D.C. officials have failed to honor the agreement they made when they successfully bid for the Expos to move to Washington. Baseball has no choice but to pursue arbitration so the terms of our original agreement can be honored and to begin to explore whatever options are available to us.&#8221;<br />
<em>(to read the entire article, use the link provided above)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 02:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I just got back in, but if you haven&#039;t heard...

Nothing was resolved during the executive session break. As many may have noted, it went way over the alotted time they said it would (6:30 PM EST was the latest they were supposed to be and they reconvined at 8:24PM).

The vote went quickly with Evans dejected.

Here&#039;s the final vote. Emergency legislation to cap costs fails 8-5:

8 Against:  Graham, Mendelson, Schwartz, Barry, Catania, Gray, Fenty, and Brown.

5  For: Orange, Patterson, Ambrose, Cropp and Evans.

Next step? Binding arbitration. Can they force the council to build the stadium? No. But, they can impose penalties on the District.

You&#039;re going to hear that the Nationals are bound for Dulles. That&#039;s nonsense. There is no site and no interim facility (can you imagine trying to get into RFK after all of this... after a full season in DC?).

Here&#039;s what&#039;s certain. There&#039;s more politics coming. Wait till tomorrow when the statements from Williams, Evans, Cropp, and DuPuy come out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got back in, but if you haven&#8217;t heard&#8230;</p>
<p>Nothing was resolved during the executive session break. As many may have noted, it went way over the alotted time they said it would (6:30 PM EST was the latest they were supposed to be and they reconvined at 8:24PM).</p>
<p>The vote went quickly with Evans dejected.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the final vote. Emergency legislation to cap costs fails 8-5:</p>
<p>8 Against:  Graham, Mendelson, Schwartz, Barry, Catania, Gray, Fenty, and Brown.</p>
<p>5  For: Orange, Patterson, Ambrose, Cropp and Evans.</p>
<p>Next step? Binding arbitration. Can they force the council to build the stadium? No. But, they can impose penalties on the District.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re going to hear that the Nationals are bound for Dulles. That&#8217;s nonsense. There is no site and no interim facility (can you imagine trying to get into RFK after all of this&#8230; after a full season in DC?).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s certain. There&#8217;s more politics coming. Wait till tomorrow when the statements from Williams, Evans, Cropp, and DuPuy come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-19</guid>
		<description>No, I didn&#039;t drop dead. The council is still wrapped up. I&#039;ll be out of touch on posts for a bit. Until then, this latest from the AP:

&lt;strong&gt;Here&#039;s the 7:13 &lt;a href=&quot;http://wjz.com/local/local_story_038191705.html&quot;&gt;AP update&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/strong&gt;

WASHINGTON (AP) – The fate of a proposed Washington Nationals baseball stadium lease remained uncertain late Tuesday after a key supporter predicted it was unlikely to be approved.

Councilman Vincent Orange, D-Ward 5, told the AP that Mayor Anthony A. Williams&#039; proposal lacked the seven votes needed for approval.

The council moved into a private session to discuss emergency legislation that would cap the city&#039;s construction costs for the stadium at $300 million. That measure would need nine votes to pass. It was unclear whether the lease itself would come up for a vote.

&quot;If we don&#039;t get this thing done today, we&#039;re going into arbitration,&quot; said Williams, who warned construction costs would only increase during the arbitration process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I didn&#8217;t drop dead. The council is still wrapped up. I&#8217;ll be out of touch on posts for a bit. Until then, this latest from the AP:</p>
<p><strong>Here&#8217;s the 7:13 <a href="http://wjz.com/local/local_story_038191705.html">AP update</a>:</strong></p>
<p>WASHINGTON (AP) – The fate of a proposed Washington Nationals baseball stadium lease remained uncertain late Tuesday after a key supporter predicted it was unlikely to be approved.</p>
<p>Councilman Vincent Orange, D-Ward 5, told the AP that Mayor Anthony A. Williams&#8217; proposal lacked the seven votes needed for approval.</p>
<p>The council moved into a private session to discuss emergency legislation that would cap the city&#8217;s construction costs for the stadium at $300 million. That measure would need nine votes to pass. It was unclear whether the lease itself would come up for a vote.</p>
<p>&#8220;If we don&#8217;t get this thing done today, we&#8217;re going into arbitration,&#8221; said Williams, who warned construction costs would only increase during the arbitration process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Cropp..

&quot;There will be a vote today. I don&#039;t think there are 7 votes today to pass the bill.&quot;

Talks of emergency bill. &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sounds as if the lease, as is, will be tabled.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Then, the emergency bill that will help get the council over the hump... at least that&#039;s the theory.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

To clarify... the current lease would be tabled until the emergency legislation, and then after that vote, then Cropp would reconvine the council to reconsider the lease.

Calling a recess... to go over administrative protocols and get a conclusion on moving where they are headed...

Take a break, folks. Get some popcorn and take a, uh... &quot;water break.&quot;

Be back in a few...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cropp..</p>
<p>&#8220;There will be a vote today. I don&#8217;t think there are 7 votes today to pass the bill.&#8221;</p>
<p>Talks of emergency bill. <em><strong>Sounds as if the lease, as is, will be tabled.</strong></em> <strong><em>Then, the emergency bill that will help get the council over the hump&#8230; at least that&#8217;s the theory.</em></strong></p>
<p>To clarify&#8230; the current lease would be tabled until the emergency legislation, and then after that vote, then Cropp would reconvine the council to reconsider the lease.</p>
<p>Calling a recess&#8230; to go over administrative protocols and get a conclusion on moving where they are headed&#8230;</p>
<p>Take a break, folks. Get some popcorn and take a, uh&#8230; &#8220;water break.&#8221;</p>
<p>Be back in a few&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Evans pulls up the leveraging stick by bringing up Jack Kent Cooke... Goes on, &quot;We&#039;ll really show MLB, won&#039;t we?! We&#039;ll tell MLB to stick it and they&#039;ll move the team to Dulles, and we&#039;ll watch the Virginia Nationals.&quot;

Commentary by Maury... Dream on, Jack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evans pulls up the leveraging stick by bringing up Jack Kent Cooke&#8230; Goes on, &#8220;We&#8217;ll really show MLB, won&#8217;t we?! We&#8217;ll tell MLB to stick it and they&#8217;ll move the team to Dulles, and we&#8217;ll watch the Virginia Nationals.&#8221;</p>
<p>Commentary by Maury&#8230; Dream on, Jack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Mendelson mentions that the deal has changed as it was originally submitted, and MLB or Nats ownership could cover the cost overruns.

&quot;Let MLB build the stadium, not the District. That&#039;s where I am, and that&#039;s where I think the council should be.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mendelson mentions that the deal has changed as it was originally submitted, and MLB or Nats ownership could cover the cost overruns.</p>
<p>&#8220;Let MLB build the stadium, not the District. That&#8217;s where I am, and that&#8217;s where I think the council should be.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Patterson...

&quot;Let&#039;s move forward.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patterson&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Let&#8217;s move forward.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Barry... &quot;Let&#039;s vote now.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry&#8230; &#8220;Let&#8217;s vote now.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Graham at the mic... An opponent of the stadium.

&quot;What would change my mind to change my vote. It was a bad deal in 2004 and a bad deal today.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham at the mic&#8230; An opponent of the stadium.</p>
<p>&#8220;What would change my mind to change my vote. It was a bad deal in 2004 and a bad deal today.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Ambrose (D-Ward 6) at the mic... remember... the ballpark is within her Ward</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ambrose (D-Ward 6) at the mic&#8230; remember&#8230; the ballpark is within her Ward</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s be clear today, folks... Those on the council are emotional today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be clear today, folks&#8230; Those on the council are emotional today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Evans...

&quot;DC was not the first choice by MLB.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evans&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;DC was not the first choice by MLB.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Orange is called for being out of order on his consultant hired by the Council. As a reminder... the consultant worked prior for the VBSA.

Evans up to bat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orange is called for being out of order on his consultant hired by the Council. As a reminder&#8230; the consultant worked prior for the VBSA.</p>
<p>Evans up to bat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Quote of the day, so far, from Marion Berry:

&quot;If Virginia Wants the Baseball Team, let them have it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote of the day, so far, from Marion Berry:</p>
<p>&#8220;If Virginia Wants the Baseball Team, let them have it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-7</guid>
		<description>The game is on... Currently opening statements by members. Mendelson says there are not enough votes. Fenty is now speaking from the dias.

For those that have a media player, you can watch the proceedings from the following link:

&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.octt.dc.gov/services/video/DC_Ch-13.asx&quot;&gt;Media Link (Windows Media, or Real Player required)&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The game is on&#8230; Currently opening statements by members. Mendelson says there are not enough votes. Fenty is now speaking from the dias.</p>
<p>For those that have a media player, you can watch the proceedings from the following link:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.octt.dc.gov/services/video/DC_Ch-13.asx">Media Link (Windows Media, or Real Player required)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-6</guid>
		<description>A bit of commentary...

Normally -- and I repeat &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;normally&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; -- when legislation goes through this much gyration at the last minute it&#039;s due to the votes not being lined up. Doing some tea leaf reading, this vote would have been teetering before the shake-ups today, but with it sounding like Cropp and Williams going for the crap-shoot, I think they&#039;re exhausted and ready to say, &quot;Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.&quot;

There&#039;s some pretzel logic in this.

For one, if this continues to hang out there longer, it simply has the capacity for more requests... more amendments. It&#039;s clear that there are some on the council that would like to continue to try and back MLB in the corner and get more concessions on the deal. Williams, as a lame-duck, has lost the power to broker a deal with the council, and now it appears Cropp is trying to pull things together.

If this mornings meeting was an indicator, this council is frustrated and tired of dealing with an ever changing landscape. The word I have received is that the meeting this morning was heated, which is becoming more the norm than the exception.

More as news becomes available. Crazy day, considering the council has yet to get into the meat and potatoes of the stadium vote in chambers today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit of commentary&#8230;</p>
<p>Normally &#8212; and I repeat <em><strong>normally</strong></em> &#8212; when legislation goes through this much gyration at the last minute it&#8217;s due to the votes not being lined up. Doing some tea leaf reading, this vote would have been teetering before the shake-ups today, but with it sounding like Cropp and Williams going for the crap-shoot, I think they&#8217;re exhausted and ready to say, &#8220;Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s some pretzel logic in this.</p>
<p>For one, if this continues to hang out there longer, it simply has the capacity for more requests&#8230; more amendments. It&#8217;s clear that there are some on the council that would like to continue to try and back MLB in the corner and get more concessions on the deal. Williams, as a lame-duck, has lost the power to broker a deal with the council, and now it appears Cropp is trying to pull things together.</p>
<p>If this mornings meeting was an indicator, this council is frustrated and tired of dealing with an ever changing landscape. The word I have received is that the meeting this morning was heated, which is becoming more the norm than the exception.</p>
<p>More as news becomes available. Crazy day, considering the council has yet to get into the meat and potatoes of the stadium vote in chambers today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-5</guid>
		<description>In this ever evolving process today... the best word may be &quot;fluid&quot;...

&lt;strong&gt;As of 3:40 EST:&lt;/strong&gt;

Word is that belief now is that the emergency legislation and lease will be voted on &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;separately&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, as part of a special session following this long legislative session. They&#039;ll need nine votes for the cap legislation and seven for the lease.

However, MLB was reportedly pissed that the emergency legislation called for the league to pay for cost overruns, or at the very least opened the league up to that possibility. So the feeling is that the emergency legislation will be pulled. The Mayor and Chairman Cropp might then put the lease up for a vote regardless, rolling the dice and hoping for the seven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this ever evolving process today&#8230; the best word may be &#8220;fluid&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>As of 3:40 EST:</strong></p>
<p>Word is that belief now is that the emergency legislation and lease will be voted on <strong><em>separately</em></strong>, as part of a special session following this long legislative session. They&#8217;ll need nine votes for the cap legislation and seven for the lease.</p>
<p>However, MLB was reportedly pissed that the emergency legislation called for the league to pay for cost overruns, or at the very least opened the league up to that possibility. So the feeling is that the emergency legislation will be pulled. The Mayor and Chairman Cropp might then put the lease up for a vote regardless, rolling the dice and hoping for the seven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maury</title>
		<link>http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>maury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 18:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maurybrown.com/?p=14#comment-4</guid>
		<description>The latest...

WTOP in DC has reported that a spokesman for Virginia governor Kaine said that the governor would be interested in pursuing the Nats should the lease be voted down.
Oh no... Dulles crashed and burned and was a poor to terrible site location to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest&#8230;</p>
<p>WTOP in DC has reported that a spokesman for Virginia governor Kaine said that the governor would be interested in pursuing the Nats should the lease be voted down.<br />
Oh no&#8230; Dulles crashed and burned and was a poor to terrible site location to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
